AGENCIES’ 2013 MAJOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ENFORCEMENT ACTIVITIES TO DATE
49
★ ★
law enforcement ocials and included discussions on the impact of counterfeit medicines, combating
counterfeit medicines and the role of drug regulatory agencies. The discussion also focused on educa-
tion and awareness, border enforcement, investigation, and criminal prosecution. The FDA, DOJ and
ICE-HSI participated in the workshop.
USPTO’s regional IP attaché for Southeast Asia co-organized with Embassy Jakarta a series of one-day
workshops on Eective Practices Against the Trade in Counterfeit Medicines in the cities of Batam, Bandung,
Jakarta, Makassar, and Surabaya, Indonesia, with each workshop drawing the attendance of 40-50
local ocials, including police and other enforcement personnel, customs ocials, judges, academics,
public health ocials, and consumer protection advocates. These workshops were co-sponsored by
the Indonesian Directorate General for Intellectual Property Rights and the Indonesian Food and Drug
Administration, the Indonesian Judicial Commission, and supported by the ICITAP Indonesian Project
of DOJ, the International Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Group, and the Indonesian Anti-Counterfeiting
Association.
Judicial and Alternative Dispute Resolution Colloquia
USPTO conducted several capacity building initiatives and training programs with the aim of facilitating
a more eective IPR enforcement system in China. USPTO co-sponsored a three-day judicial confer-
ence on IPR adjudication. The conference—the rst of its kind in China—involved judges from the
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) and the Supreme People’s Court (IPR Division), as well
as academics, private sector lawyers, government representatives, and judges from throughout China.
The program presented a valuable opportunity to highlight dierences between the U.S. and Chinese
IPR enforcement systems and how such dierences impact the ability of rightholders to successfully
protect their intellectual property.
USPTO, in coordination with the International Judicial Academy, held a seminar for a delegation of
Brazilian judges at the Global Intellectual Property Academy. The program addressed legal issues related
to patents, trademarks, copyrights, and IP enforcement. Participants also received an overview of the U.S.
civil law court system as it relates to enforcement of patents and other IP rights. The session included a
digital video conference with the oce of the IPR attaché in Brazil, which involved discussions analyzing
the U.S. and Brazilian legal systems for civil IP enforcement. USPTO hosted a visit of twenty Sri Lankan
judges, including one Supreme Court Justice and three High Court Judges. The delegation was briefed
on IP enforcement in the United States and the critical role of the judiciary. The program also included
visits to the CAFC, and the Court of Federal Claims. The Sri Lankan judges also had an opportunity to
attend a brieng on Alternative Dispute Resolution for IPR Cases at the Federal Judicial Center, and
observed proceedings at the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.
USPTO organized an IPR program for judges of the Supreme Arbitration Court of Russia. The Russian
judges consulted on civil, criminal, and administrative IPR enforcement issues with Federal judges at
the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, the Southern District of New York, and the Court of
International Trade, and also administrative law judges at ITC and USPTO. The United Nations Economic
Commission for Europe in partnership with USPTO held a sub-regional conference for judges and
prosecutors on Selected Intellectual Property Issues: Valuation, Competition and Anti-trust in the Former
Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. Judges, prosecutors and attorneys from the Albania, Croatia, and